|
SCREEN SHOTS showing
vote manipulation in the BOEHNER-CONDIT-COUSSOULE-HARLOW RACE
For the US House of Representatives for the 8th District of Ohio,
for the Election of November 2, 2010
PAGE 1
(this page was originally a word
document, thus the references to pages)
These screen shots are not in order of time. –
So, for now, I've put a commentary around each screen shot, as a little help
for everyone on how to read these screen shots. (More
screen shots from earlier in the evening, showing the steady "good
showing" of the Condit vote count, will be up on this page soon).
This first screen shot is from Cincinnati Channel 12
TV (a local CBS affiliate) news website, at 11:06 PM EST on November 2, 2010.
Notice that the Condit vote count is at 2% of the vote, with 79% of the precincts
reporting. This followed the time period from roughly 9 PM to 11 PM
where local 12 news showed 55% of the precincts reporting, and
Condit with 15,000+ votes, representing roughly 18% of the vote.
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
PAGE
2
Now – 21 minutes later (see bottom
left corner of screen shot) the same local TV 12 website shows 99%
of the precincts reporting, and the Condit vote at 35, 579,
representing 17% of the vote. Note that the Democrat, Mr. Justin
Coussoule is in 3rd place with 7,000 less votes than
Condit. This is in sync with what was shown all night, from roughly
9 PM to roughly 11 PM on all media sources
that reported on the vote totals of
all four candidates in the John Boehner race,
-- both on air on TV -- and their websites.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
PAGE
3
Here
is the NATIONAL ABC News website (see words in top blue line on top
of website). ABCnews.go.com is also visible in the address bar if you
have enough magnification. This screen shot is from
11:37 PM EST – and shows 99% of
the precincts reporting – please note that the Condit vote is at
35,579, representing 17% of the vote, while Democrat Coussoule is in
3rd place with 29,485 votes, representing 15% of the
vote. Please note that the national ABC website screen shot on this
page – matches exactly with the local Channel 12 news (a CBS
affiliate) screen shot on page 2.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
PAGE
4
The screen shots on page 4 are BOTH
from ABC News national website. One is at 12:20 AM EST – showing the
Condit vote total at 36,202 votes, representing 18% of the vote.
Notice that the top screen shot on page four – shows 100% of the
precincts reporting, so this is a FINAL count.
But 46 minutes later,
the same ABC News national website has a NEW “final count”, showing the Condit vote at 3,494 votes, or 2% of the
vote, or last place.
The difference between my first "final count" and
my second "final count" on ABC News national website is 32,708
votes, i.e., 32,708 votes were subtracted from my vote total in the
first "final count."
Note that the Democratic candidate, Mr. Coussoule, now has 66,473 votes, or 30% of the vote count.
Math will
show that ABC added 32,708 votes to the Democrat's total in the
second "final count" -- plus 53 votes. In other words, the exact
total that was subtracted from the Condit vote count in the second
"final count" -- was ADDED to the Democrat's vote count -- PLUS --
ABC added an additional 53 votes to the Democrat's (Mr. Coussoule)
vote total in the second "final vote." Leaving aside motives, this
is what happened.
It is shown in the HBO
documentary, Hacking Democracy, starring computer votefraud
investigator Bev Harris – that this type of last minute
falsification can be done by the "computerized votefraud syndicate"
– as easily as you and I highlight and then fix a typo or a
misspelled word in one of our word documents.
This was also
demonstrated on CNBC by Bev Harris to former Democratic Governor and Presidential candidate
Howard Dean in, I believe, 2005. That YouTube is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhMUtzOxjJY ; Howard Dean’s final
comment in that TV spot is not on point – most of the time there is a paper trail
(paper ballots) – but the local Board of Elections snatches the
ballots from the people at closing time on election night – and
impounds them behind police guard for 21 days or so – plenty of
time for the ballots to be switched so that the computer-generated election night results
“come true.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
PAGE
5
Please note that on page 5 we have also the exact two “final
results” on the local Channel 12 WKRC TV website. (Remember, Channel
12 in Cincinnati, Ohio is a CBS affiliate – so
obviously CBS news national and ABC News national are getting their
results from the exact same source).
Please note that the local TV 12
screen shots are 23 minutes apart.
In
the first “final count” screen shot, the Condit
count is shown at 36,202, and that screen shot was captured at 12:28 AM
EST, November 3, 2010. – AND -- in the SECOND “final count”
screen shot, the Condit vote count is shown to be 3,494, and that
screen shot was captured at
12:51 AM – again – only 23 minutes later. (!!!!)
MORE COMMENTARY BELOW SCREEN SHOTS ON THIS PAGE.
The explanation for the exact same
discrepancies at ABC and CBS are that the local county election
officials either give the consortium of National TV Networks total access to the
main frame election computer in each local county -- OR -- the
consortium of the Big TV Networks surreptitiously access the real
time vote count in each county computer via a modum in each
computer. (Several companies inadvertently admitted this to
investigator Philip O'Halloran as reported in the Relevance
Magazine article, "Pandora's Black Box: Did It Really Count Your
Vote?", linked on the home page of votefraud.org; also, the shocking
eye-witness report of Christopher Bollyn found in the article "How a
Private Company Counts Our Votes on Election Night", also linked on
the home page of votefraud.org
What is this talk of a "consortium"
of the Big TV Networks? Since the 1960s there has been such a
consortium of the Big TV Networks, which manifested in the company
Voter News Service (VNS), which changed its name to
National Election Pool (NEP). The original company in the 1960s was owned by ABC, CBS, NBC, and
Associated Press (AP) wire. CNN joined in the 1980s, and FOX joined
circa 1996.
As stated above, this treasonous and slippery company was called “Voter News
Service (VNS)” from at least as early as 1988 to 2003. The name was
changed in 2003 because of the stench that was rising from the
events surrounding the 2000 Presidential
Election, including the fraudulent projections made by VNS on that
election night. -- Bill O’Reilly of
FOX news apologized on air for going with the VNS projections on election
night 2000. (But nothing has changed, and O’Reilly has not reported
on the truth about US “elections.” Lou Dobbs did a lot of reporting
on this subject of computerized elections on CNN, and ran into so
much opposition from his bosses, that he decided to quit before they
fired him.)
The truth about Voter News Service
is covered in the book, "Votescam: The Stealing of America" by James
and Kenneth Collier. It is also covered in the article, "A House
Without Doors", by Jim Condit Jr., linked on the home page of
votefraud.org --
The 5 Big TV networks and AP wire
service cooperate hand in glove with Diebold, Hart, Sequoia, and
Election Systems and Software (ES & S) -- the big four
computerized vote-counting companies that count 96% of the vote in
the USA on election night.
Furthermore, the Big Media, along
with these four, sinister mega-companies, -- cooperate with the
national leadership of the Republican and Democratic parties to pull
off this theft of the USA via computerized votescam.
The sin of the local county Boards
of Election is that they have allowed themselves to be persuaded by
the RNC and the DNC to STEP ASIDE -- and hand over the processing of
the ballots to the four big computer vote-processing companies.
In other words, over the last 22
years, and even earlier (back to 1973), the Republican National
Committee (RNC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have
cajoled, threatened, bribed or incentivized the LOCAL Democratic and
Republican Party leadership in each county to delegate the
"counting" of the local ballots in each county to either Diebold,
Hart, Sequoia, or Election Systems and Software (ES & S). So in
about 99% of our 3141 counties in the USA, these sinister companies
"count" the vote in secret, on secret computer programs. And the
police power in each town and county are used to make sure that no
candidate, no reporter, and no citizen can have access to the
ballots on election day. So no one can double-check or challenge the
"results" released by Diebold et al -- and the big media reports
these "results" as if they were verified and sent down from heaven.
IN OTHER WORDS, you and I, as
voters, provide window dressing for the gigantic scam now passing
for American "elections."
Therefore, the major
MEDIA, neck deep in the treason, will never report on what is going
on, with the exceptions of a few minor reports here and there, which
are probably initiated by an honest person in the news team. These
minor reports, many of which are on YouTube – are treated as
unimportant “novelty” stories by the big media. The drug rehab
problems of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan are given much more time
on the major media. Such gossipy reports are meant to distract the American people from the
takeover of the country and the world that is being accomplished by
this computerized votescam.
As Ricky Ricardo might say:
“Somebody has a lot of ‘splainin’ to do.”
(See the blue box
on the right hand side of the home page at www.votefraud.org –
especially the youtube video linked in that blue box, and the
thirteen articles which follow it. Then you will understand what the
big newsmedia, the four sinister computer companies they hire to
“count the vote” each election day, and the leadership of the
Democratic and Republican parties – are hiding from you and America.
You will also find what we must do about it so restore our country.)
|
