Introduction to Screen Shots Showing Vote
Manipulation in Condit/Boehner Congressional Race on November 2,
2010 (click link on this page to see actual screen shots)
In the 8th Congressional District of Ohio on
November 2, 2010 --
throughout much of the election night evening -- Constitution Party
Candidate Jim Condit Jr. (me) was shown to have more than 15,000
votes (about 18% of the vote) with 55% of the precincts
reporting.
--- This strong showing was reported for hours on the ABC
News national website, and on the local TV stations in Cincinnati,
Ohio; also ABC and NBC and MSNBC reported such a strong showing on
their TV coverage nationally in the crawl at the bottom of the
screen; --
--- UNTIL! -- at about 11:15 PM all media outlets dropped Condit Jr. to about 3,400 votes,
or 2% of the vote. (!!!)
--- Then, most absurdly, the Condit vote bounced
back and forth, always simultaneously on all stations and media
outlets -- and was "finally" reported
at 36,202 with 100% of the precincts reporting at 12:30 AM EST --
that's a FINAL VOTE COUNT. -- Then -- 20 minutes later, at 12:50 AM
EST -- 32,000 votes
were taken away from the Condit vote total, and added to the
Democratic candidate's vote total -- for a NEW "final count" at
12:50 AM EST -- screen shots linked below.
-- AND, the next morning, the Cincinnati Enquirer
reported the Condit vote total at 36,202, despite the
"unexplainable" drop on all the TV station websites. So, the
original final was Republican John Boehner circa 130,000 votes,
Constitution Party Jim Condit Jr. 36,202, Democrat Justin Coussoule
circa 29,000 votes, and Libertarian Harlan circa 5,000 votes. ---
--- in the SECOND "final count" -- 20
minutes after the FIRST "FINAL COUNT" -- all TV outlets dropped
Condit Jr. 32, 000 votes, and added very close to that total to the
Democratic candidate's totals. --- The reason all TV outlets did the
same thing at the same time in this vote manipulation -- is that
they all allow a sinister organization named "News Election Pool" (NEP)
have access to their websites to upload "vote totals." Checking on
Wikipedia, you will find that NEP is JOINTLY owned by ABC, CBS, NBC,
CNN, FOX, and AP wire. NEP is given direct access to the
election computers on election night where they can monitor and
manipulate the vote. --- Almost all of our 3000+ counties delegate
the election process to one of four major computer companies:
Diebold, ES & S, Hart or Sequoia. These four companies "count" our
elections on easily rigged, secret computer programs. No one, not
even the computer professionals in each county, is allowed to see
the source code for these programs. THIS IS A SCANDAL AND CRIME
which makes Watergate look like a Church pie baking contest.
By Jim Condit Jr.
At the link below you will find the incredible
screen shots showing vote manipulation in my race against
Congressman John Boehner. I have other screen shots from earlier in
the evening which will be put up at another link on this page as
soon as I can arrange it. (Intro on this page continues after the
below link.)
Here
are the screen shots from the website of WKRC-TV, Channel 12 in
Cincinnati, Ohio (a CBS affiliate) -- and from the National ABC News
Website
And we also have numerous witnesses willing to
offer an affidavit as to what they witnessed throughout the evening,
and as to what screen shots they took to document what they
witnessed.
What they witnessed was that I was shown to have
15,000 votes throughout the evening, from about 9:30 PM onwards, at
which point 55% (or about 293 out of 528 precincts reporting).
My totals turned into wildly swinging vote totals
from 11 PM EST until the "100% Precincts Reporting" notice
was posted on all media websites at 12:30 AM EST.. My vote totals
fluctuated from 15,600 -- to 4200 or so -- to
35,000 or so -- and then back down to 4200 or so. -- These
vote totals were credited to me during election night November 2,
2010 on the following sources:
-- the ABC national news website,
-- Channel 12 local news (CBS affiliate in
Cincinnati, Ohio) website,
-- and on air -- on regular TV -- on WLW-TV (NBC
local affiliate in Cincinnati, Ohio)
This page and its links shows much of the above,
except for the Channel 5 TV news coverage (often a scroll across the
bottom of the screen). This TV coverage was witnessed by numerous
people, some of whose affidavits will appear on this page soon..
Here's the basic summary of what happened:
A. At about 8:30 PM on election night, November
2, 2010 -- I received a message from a friend near Columbus, Ohio
that ABC national news was showing me at 24% of the vote in the
congressional race in the 8th District of Ohio. Congressman John
Boehner had about 62% of the vote according to the reports at this
time of the evening; the Democrat (Justin Coussoule) had 11%, and
the Libertarian (Harlow) had about 3% of the vote. (I, again, was on
the ballot as the Constitution Party candidate.
B. I was surprised, because I expected for the
computers to show me at 200 or 300 votes for the whole night.
C. I immediately enlisted a few reliable
researchers (also friends) to start taking screen shots and watching
TV so we could have some evidence that I was being shown as getting
a healthy percentage of the vote. I told all of them that, if past
history was any guide, I would be dropped to 2% of the vote by the
end of the evening -- and that's what the people the next day would
see, and any future researchers into this election would see. (See
explanation below of the dynamics involved in suppressing the votes
of "politically incorrect" candidates since the 1970s.)
D. All night, ABC national news website showed me
either ahead of the Democrat of a little bit behind him. From about
9:30 PM to 11:15 PM -- I was shown to have 15,661 votes, with 55% of
the precincts reporting. Logically, then -- I would have about
30,000 votes. And ABC national news website -- and the local Channel
12 WKRC TV website -- did show me with 35,000 votes right before all
sources dropped me to about 4000 votes at about 11:30 PM.
(The screen shots I did not yet have time to
scan and put up show the following: at 10:29 PM, a screen shot from
local Channel 12 (WKRC TV in Cincinnati, the CBS affiliate --
showing my vote count at 15,661 at 13%; and another screen shot at
10:14 PM from the national ABC News website, showing the same
results; the reason both show the same, even thought they are from
different networks, is because ALL the TV Networks get their results
from AP Wire and a company they jointly own, formerly Voter News
Service, VNS -- now renamed News Election Pool, NEP. By the way, AP
wire jointly owns NEP with ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and FOX. Doubters can
check here, among other places:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Election_Pool
Yes, the
feigned competition between the Big TV networks to call the "winner"
-- is and always has been a total hoax. See "A House without Doors"
here:
http://www.votefraud.org/house_without_doors_and_update2008.htm
--
When you open the below word document below, you
may have to click on each page to have the screen shot on that page appear.
-- The 1st page shows 79% of the precincts
reporting, and I am shown with 2,860 votes, which would be 2% of the
votes. If you get a magnifying glass out, you can see in the lower
right hand corner that the time was 11:06 PM.
-- The 2nd page shows 99% of the precincts
reporting, and I am shown with 35,579, which would be 17% of the
vote; the time in the lower right hand corner shows 11:29 PM.
-- The 3rd page shows the same totals with the
99% of the precincts reporting, but the time is 11:37 PM. Both pages
2 and 3 show the Democrat, Mr. Coussoule, was at 29,485 votes, which
is 17% of the vote; and the Libertarian with 4,827 votes, or 2% of
the vote. The incumbent, Congressman John Boehner, at this point is
shown at 133,976, which would be 66% of the vote.
-- Page 4 has two screen shots, one at 12:20 AM
on November 3, 2010 (still election night) showing 100% of the
precincts reporting, and with me (Jim Condit Jr.) at 36,202 votes,
or 18% of the vote; the SECOND screen shot was taken at 1:06 AM, and
my vote total had by then "dropped" to 3,494, or 2% of the vote. By
the way, in this "final" I was now in last place, behind the
Libertarian, who remained at about 4,500 votes, where he had been
all night. It appears on this last screen shot that 32,708 were
taken from my vote totals -- and added to the Democrat's vote
totals. (And, I guess to not look too suspicious, 53 additional
votes were added to the Democrat's total, in addition to the 32,708
taken from my total votes.) Even my greatest opponents have to admit
that this is a bit amazing to see, with screen shot proofs and all.
-- Page 5 is a screen shot at 12:29 AM showing me
with the 36,202 vote totals, and . . .
-- Page 6 is a screen shot at 12:51 AM, showing
me with the 3,494 vote total.
Here are the screen shots that show what happened
near the end of the evening, right before and as they reported "100%
of the precincts reporting."
Here
are the screen shots from the website of WKRC-TV, Channel 12 in
Cincinnati, Ohio (a CBS affiliate) -- and from the National ABC News
Website
. . . more to come, but I stayed up all night on
election night (November 2-3, 2010)
because I thought this needed to go up immediately.
Here's how it works:
1. The local Democrat and Republican Parties step
out of the way and delegate the "counting" to one of four
anti-American "New World Order" tyranny companies, either Diebold,
ES &S, Hart, or Sequoia.
2. The local Boards of Election then allow the
elections to be conducted in a criminal manner, that is, secret vote
counts conducted by secret computer programs, with police power used
to prevent the citizens from seeing or counting their own ballots on
election day. All 49 states, and half of the counties in New
Hampshire, allow these criminal election procedures, in blatant
violation of two US Supreme Court decisions, US v Mosley (1964) and
Reynolds v Sims (1915). And US v. Wesberry, which says without the
right to vote and the enforcement that our vote is counted
accurately and honestly -- all other rights are purely illusory.
See the youtube video, "South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul"
-- and the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy, or this article by
computer votefraud investigator, Dan Gutenkauf:
http://www.votefraud.org/Action/Gutenkauf/citizens.html
3. AP Wire (a Rothschild company), FOX News, and
all the other TV Networks are given access directly into the
computers counting the votes DURING THE ELECTION COUNT. See
Christopher Bollyn's eye witness report from Cook County in 2004:
http://www.votefraud.org/how_a_private_company_counts_our_votes.htm
4. Anti-Americans "make war by way of deception"
upon the USA by monitoring the elections in real time -- and simply
altering the the results when they don't like them. The
preponderance of the evidence shows that these illegal monitors and
manipulators of our elections are from the dark side of the MOSSAD
(Israel's CIA) and the dark side of our own CIA.
5Citizens can't get at the ballots for 21 days or
so IF a recount is ever conducted. -- plenty of time for the hired
computer companies to switch the paper ballots to make the computer
results "come true."
6. This alteration and apparent suppression of my
votes in the election of November 2, 2010 -- has happened thousands
of times since the age of computer "vote-counts" began circa 1973.
-- Or what do the media outlets who published this information wish
to offer as an explanation? We will publish open letters to these
media outlets (and send these letters to them by certified mail),
and publish their explanations, if any, on, this website.
7. One other observation: Constitution Party
candidate for Attorney General Robert Owens, despite endorsement by
the Ohio statewide Tea Party -- only was give 3% of the vote. Why
would that be? Because if Owens was given 5% or more of the vote
(which I believe he certainly received) -- the the Constitution
Party would have automatic ballot position for 2012 -- something the
evil Ruling Elite behind the National Democratic and Republican
parties do NOT want.
It may be helpful for many to view this 10 minute
youtube: "South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul."
That's all for now. |